Yet the Conservatives, who always claim to be tough on crime, introduced a bill in the House that did not even require sex offenders to disclose the cars that they drove or used. Madam Speaker, that is another very thoughtful question from the member.
That is why judicial discretion and prosecutorial discretion are important in this registry. The registry works to enhance public protection by helping ontario sex offender registry legislation in Fredericton identify possible suspects known to be near the offence site.
They will have to answer to Canadians for that. He is an expert in the area. His speech has elevated the calibre of the debate in the House of Commons. In April the committee was informed that the national registry contained the names of over 19, offenders.
Ottawa, he said, is going to build its own registry.
The Conservatives largely make up numbers in their budget documents anyway, so we all expect that. They are the ones who are experienced in dealing with this. We have reservations around certain specific issues, which I will highlight in my remarks this morning. Ottawa designed its own distinct database—a trickle-down operation in which the bulk of the costs, and the work, actually ontario sex offender registry legislation in Fredericton on the provinces and territories.
That is why judicial discretion and prosecutorial discretion are important in this registry. Madam Speaker, I do not know that I can do justice to my hon.
Canadians want to live in safer communities. Prosecutors either forget to ask for them, or ask for them in cases when a repeat offender is already ordered to comply. New Democrats agree with this because originally police officers told us that access to the registry was too rigid.
It is up to those offices to ensure the compliance of local sex offenders. It is important to note that the public does not have access to the national registry.