In a sense — and we think that this was done in good faith — proposition wrongly assumes that opposition is endorsing the content of religious ethics. To not legalize same-sex marriage is to further perpetuate the problem of minority discrimination that has stained human history. Chicago Tribune, 29 February The state perceives that it has some benefit from creating marriage as a legal institution, and it does, although not to the same degree that those who engage in marriage receive benefits.
At the same time, we believe that the quandaries faced by homosexuals are as a result of the way in which fellow citizens treat them.
The hidden psychology of pandemics across time and contexts — Cambridge, Cambridgeshire. We have contended that same-sex marriage has no social ill that spreads to the individual who wish to believe that same-sex marriage is wrong other than perhaps discomfort, and we have established that discomfort at a government policy is not basis enough to reject that government policy.
Proposition finally came up with a direct piece of argument to make the letter of the motion come alive in the dying moments of the debate — civil marriage is a non-religious institution by its very nature and therefore same sex marriage in the philippines debate positive side of a capacitor in Antioch offence anyone would take at the thought of allowing gay persons to access the institution of civil marriage, should be ignored.
On the one hand, they allow laws to reflect public mores by maintaining marriage as an exclusive civil institution in places where that is desired by the majority. In Central America, support is much lower: 33 percent of Costa Ricans, 28 percent of Nicaraguans, and 27 percent of Ecuadorians support same-sex marriage.
On team opposition we decided to focus the debate on the two central questions at stake: Why is marriage important, and what will the consequences be if we legalize same-sex marriages? ILGA found 35 percent of Indians and 30 percent of Pakistanis in thought same-sex marriage should be legal.
Even if we were to accept, for sake of argument, that it is a moral truism that homosexuality is acceptable, and same-sex marriage derivatively desirable, the end-goal of persuading those who do not believe these claims, and thereby improving the lot of gay persons, can be massively harmed by a blanket moral demand by the United Nations, or team USA, that same-sex marriage be legalised immediately.
Jonathan Rauch — Minnesota Daily, 24 November Opposition is not arguing, as we had said before but which must have fallen on closed eyes, that homosexuality is immoral.